Archive for - The Airfix Tribute Forum - The Airfix Tribute Forum was established in April 2006 to discuss the making of Airfix models. Email: admin at airfixtributeforum.co.uk
|

XN923
|
Out of interest, when was the last 1/600 ship tooled? I see Airfix is listing at least one 1/700 ship now (albeit one tooled by another manufacturer) but it would be a shame to lose the 1/600 scale for good, especially as there are some great ships from the Airfix back catalogue that are crying out for companions.
Dreadnought would be great, and with careful planning could include parts for the Bellerophon class which didn't differ all that much, and several of which were present at the Battle of Jutland.
Tiger is my personal favourite, possibly the best proportioned of all the battle cruisers, and the fastest until the under-armoured Renown/Repulse came along.
IIRC the Airfix Warspite is in WW2 configuration, which was rather ugly and difficult to convert to Jutland spec. I wonder if it would be possible to get another sprue with new upperworks to get a 1916 era Queen Elizabeth class?
I'd also like to see the 'Outrageous' (Courageous, Glorious and Furious, aka Outrageous, Uproarious and Spurious) class kitted, both in 'large light cruiser' and later aircraft carrier configurations - a man can dream, can't he? I imagine the market would be... select.
|
russ
|
Maybe not as "select" as it appears.
Certainly in 1/350 scale the Royal Navy ships appear to be very popular, but the guys at White Ensign models would know for sure.
Warships are not really my area, though I do appreciate them both in prototype and model form, and I would have thought a Type 42 Destroyer for example would be a good seller.
|
Beaufighter
|
The main reason nobody's done a plastic Dreadnought is because most models are bought by the Americans and the Japanese. Ship modellers there have little to no interest in any warships other than WW2 Japanese, US and German, in roughly that order. That is, Japanese modellers like Japanese ships, US modellers like Japanese and US ships, and German ships sell on the Luftwaffe '46 principle.
90% of the ship modelling market isn't basically interested in WW1 because their countries didn't appreciably fight in it. ICM produced a 1/350 Koenig a few years back and it bombed.
1/600 would be a nice scale for WW1 ships because they're all markedly smaller than their WW2 counterparts. Dreadnought was about the same tonnage as HMS Belfast, give or take, so that gives one an idea of how small she'd be. In 1/700 alongside a 1/600 Hood she looks like a small cruiser.
My beef about ship kits is that every one that comes out or gets retooled is the same old boring 4 x 2 / 3 x 3 configuration. Every year another Yamato, another Bismarck...yawn.
As Steven says it would nice to have a wing turreted ship for a change and if someone were to tool a Goeben or an Agincourt, with a sprue of WW1 accessory bits, the scratchbuilders would buy shedloads just to get hold of all the turret and other goodies. It's not that much of a leap from a Goeben to a Von der Tann or a Seydlitz or indeed a Friedrich der Grosse.
The 1/700 market pays up to £20 quite happily for a boring battleship with no combat history (has USS New Jersey ever fired on another ship?), so a 1/600 Agincourt with spares should be priced at £25 rather than half that, as with the ageing Hood kits.
It could be though that any new 1/600 tooling would simply be a retool of a best seller and mightn't / needn't be in 1/600 anyway.
|
XN923
|
Yes, I've noticed before that the British ships that get kitted tend to be ones that were sunk by the Japanese or Germans - Hood, Repulse, Prince of Wales etc...
For me, the dreadnought era - by which I mean from the building of Dreadnought to the building of Hood - is the most fascinating period of military ship design, and the lack of mainstream kits from this period is disappointing. As you say, some different configurations would be nice. What about a 'Blucher', with hexagonal main armament, for example?
|
Beaufighter
|
Indeed - I'd settle for a release or two that enabled you to scratch the rest of another ship. So an Invincible could be stretched to make and Indefatigable, a Moltke to make a Seydlitz, etc.
|
XN923
|
| Beaufighter wrote: | | Indeed - I'd settle for a release or two that enabled you to scratch the rest of another ship. So an Invincible could be stretched to make and Indefatigable, a Moltke to make a Seydlitz, etc. |
Indeed. IIRC the 'cats' (Lion, Princess Royal, Queen Mary and Tiger) all had very similar hulls (Tiger was very slightly longer), though differed markedly in upperworks and armament layout. Same hull could give you a fighting chance of scratching one of the others, or better, allow the whole family to be kitted. Royal Sovereigns leave me cold (being basically Woolworth Queen Elizabeths) but there was probably considerable commonality between the 13.5in armed middle-era dreadnoughts - the Orions, King George Vs, and Iron Dukes were substantially very similar, enabling around 12 ships to be built with largely the same guts of the kit. I'm sure the German dreadnoughts were the same.
|
Goggles
|
DreadnaughtI'd buy some - I think they'd fly off the shelves!
Simon
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
Resin models of HMS Dreadnought in 1/350 (from Steel Navy) and 1/700 (from Combrig) scale are already available, so people who build in those scales already have what they want.
Us 1/600 ship builders want a 1/600 HMS Dreadnought to go with our other 1/600 ships! There must be a market for 1/600 ships as otherwise the current 1/600 ships would not be in the catalogue. A 1/700 model is also very small, 229 mm compared with 268 mm for 1/600.
The last 1/600 kit that Airfix issued was Queen Mary 2 in 2004. Before that was HMS Repulse in 1982.
Thanks for your vote Goggles! Now up to 70 votes.
|
Brews
|
What are the chances of this being a happening thing?
|
Beaufighter
|
Zero?
|
XN923
|
That's a bit defeatist Beaufighter. Seems to me that pressure from modellers can have quite a bit of influence on what kitmakers produce - look at the TSR2 and McLaren F1 car. With a bit of concerted lobbying it could happen. Airfix needs to be sure that they can sell enough kits to make it worth their while, that's all. The return of Iron Duke 'by popular demand' suggests that there is enough interest in the dreadnought era and I'm willing to bet that a fair few people who want Iron Duke - or already own it - would want Dreadnought as well. It must be worth something as a reminder of a time when Britain led the world in quite a bit.
|
Beaufighter
|
I think you are right with respect to the more popular subject areas, i.e. aircraft and anything with a swastika on it. I'm less sure with watercraft.
Ships, however, have lately been poor sellers. ICM's 1/350 Koenig flopped. 10 or 12 years ago WEM did a resin Hood in 1/350 scale that was nearly £1,000 and that flopped. To show that it's not just a price issue, ICM then did a plastic Hood in the same scale and that also flopped.
The only ship subjects that sell reliably are WW2 IJN and USN, and Bismarck. Even then, it's a minority interest within the hobby.
Iron Duke is a special case because the moulds already exist.
If Airfix said they'd do it on a syndicate basis - i.e. 500 people put in £1000 each and the result is a 1/600 release of Dreadnought - would you put your own money into it? I wouldn't.
As I suggested upthread, something may be possible if a new 1/600 WW1 kit were easily convertable / transmutable into another ship or several others. The best bet might be to produce a kit with the superstructure and weaponry done in such a way that if you care to carve your own hull, you can recycle those bits onto your hull to make a new ship.
Although, if you can do that, you can probably scratchbuild your own 1/600 Dreadnought quite easily!
If Airfix do go for more ships, I think a new 1/72 offering is the more likely. They have a good presence in this space already and the models are a nice display size without having hundreds of tiny parts to lose.
Meanwhile, when's the Free Enterprise getting reissued??
|
Ratch
|
ScalesAs much as I like to see large scale ships, they're not something I could make a collection of, due to the enormous display space they occupy I suppose I prefer 1/600 as that is the scale I started with, is a comfortable size and can be displayed in numbers
But this brings another question What about all those odd scales that other manufacturers seem to like 1:720 - 1:570 etc etc
Why is it that shipmakers have not settled on the equivalent of the one true scale
I do like my models to sit next to others in the same scale, to give a sense of comparative size What do you guys reckon
|
XN923
|
But Trumpeter recently released a 1/350 and 1/700 Hood and they seem to have done well enough. Sure, the Koenig flopped, but German Dreadnoughts are hardly the biggest subject and the small number that ever did fire a shot in anger fired precious few, only at the Battle of Jutland, and didn't hit anything. My point about the Iron Duke was that the presence and reissue of this kit demonstrates that there is some appetite for kits of this era in this scale. Jutland and WW1 British Dreadnoughts are a phenomenally popular subject in book sales, and I don't see why this couldn't transfer to model kits if only there were enough to make a decent collection. And in any case I think Dreadnought could transcend interest in this particular era because of its significance. If marketed right in a way that was bound to national pride and 'Britannia rules the waves' it could sell plenty to the casual market. In many ways it's a 'Spitfire' or 'Lancaster' of ships.
No, I wouldn't pay £1000 to ensure a kit, but I would be prepared to put some money in and plenty of time to lobby/market if we could get organised enough to make it worthwhile.
I see your point about the convertability of kits - see my earlier post about the 13.5in armed classes of British Dreadnought. Airfix could possibly be quite canny here - given that several early Japanese Dreadnoughts were built in Britain, or to British designs, they could possibly tool up to allow some of these designs to be built as well. The Kongo class for example shared marked similarities with the Lion class, in hull at least. There may well be some early Japanese Dreadnoughts that shared considerable similarities with Dreadnought herself.
|
walrus
|
Hi Ratch
i can't remember where i saw it recently but...
Airfix apparently used 1/600 as that was the scale of the drawings used by the RN- which makes sense
overseas modelmakers obviously had other ideas/plans/resources- who knows- but they are all heretics
|
Flash Flash
|
I like Revell's 1/570 I don't know why but I find them easier than Airfix ships
|
Brews
|
1:570 is close enough to 1:600, I think
I know what you mean, Heggy, Revell ships have pretty good fit.
|
wookie
|
I, like many, was brought up on 1/60, and to me it seems a good compromise scale. I really cannot get on with smaller scales like 1/700 or 1/720 as even as a teenager that little bit smaller challenged both my eyesight and tweezer control.
I suppose I'm lucky in now being in a position to own a reasonably large house so i can build some display shelves to take the larger scales and have got the ex-Heller 1/400 KGV and Hood to build. But I'd much rather have a greater range of good quality models in 1/600.
I suppose it comes down to the same debate raging in the DREADNOUGHT thread. Scale warships just have never taken off with the same impetus that aircraft have. Hence, no one manufacturer was able to dominate and thus impose "their" scale. I think if anything we might see 1/350 becoming "the" standard scale of the future in the same way that 1/48 seems to be gaining interest over 1/72 for aircraft.
|
DavidM
|
Are you sure that the ICM Hood ever achieved any real world existence?
Well, thanks to the Japanese the only viable smaller scale for ship modelling is 1/700 which is just about okay for me to manipulate, if not totally ideal, specially with the smaller ships like the V and W Class destroyers from Tamiya.
David
|
Digs
|
I've always thought of 1:600 as following on from the Brit 50' to the inch plans for wooden ship models that predated plastic kits during WWII and immediately after.
Does anybody recall who marketed these plans? (Or know what I'm referring to for that matter! ). I'd love to have another go at one.
Paul
Edit - rereading this, it's unclear. Wooden models of steel ships I mean. I remember building Scharnhorst, Hood and an oil tanker from the same series of plans
|
peebeep
|
As Digs points out 1/600 is 1" = 50', a sensible Imperial scale in that pre-metrication many people would be able to relate to it. 1/720 is 1" = 60', which also makes sense as an Imperial scale. Revell ships were, IIRC, 'box' scales which accounts for peculiarities like 1/570 (1" = 47'-6"). Ship scales have certainly been arbitrary over the years, but if there were to be unification it would look like 1/700 and 1/350 would come out on top. The team at Airfix must be thinking long and hard whether to stay true to 1/600 or defect to 1/700. I was not at all surprised that the new carrier kit is going to be 1/350.
peebeep
|
daniel7891
|
I have always liked the 1/600 scale, its what I started with. However I do like the 1/350 because you can add more detail but they do take up a lot of space
|
dancho
|
We all know that 1/700 is the perfect scale for floating in the bathtub.
|
orionv
|
|
orionv
|
For me the 600ème scale is the best,not too small,not too big...Very good for detail and painting and make a nice seascape...
|
walrus
|
| Quote: | | However I do like the 1/350 because you can add more detail |
Hi Daniel
unless you are Remy and his dwarves
you can add lots of detail at 1/600 too
|
orionv
|
|
daniel7891
|
I tried PE in 1/600 and it drove me insane. I haven't got Remy's skill for ships I'm a bit clumsy. Perhaps you could lend me your dwarves Remy
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
I'll happily fork over £1000 to Airfix, on the proviso that I get a proportionate share in the profits and see their sales figures for their other 1/600 ships. Lets see, £10.52 each in Series 4 with 15% VAT and 50% markup gives £6.10 to Airfix. I'd guess that moulding, packaging and transport costs would be 33% of that leaving £4.07 profit to Airfix. To break even with £50,000 development cost would require that 12,300 kits be sold, similar to that for the limited edition 1/72 TSR-2. Thus, Airfix might do the same thing and make this a limited edition kit.
This is one reason I believe that Airfix are reissuing the Iron Duke and Warspite, to test the waters for WWI battleships. If they are reasonable good sellers, then I think we have a good chance of seeing HMS Dreadnought, hopefully in 1/600 scale. If they don't sell, then we won't. Unfortunately, I have already paid quite a bit for these two kits on eBay (AU$49.31 or £22.03 for Warspite and AU$45.27 or £20.23 for Iron Duke, including postage), as I had no idea if Airfix would ever reissue these kits.
On eBay Warspite and Iron Duke have sold from £12.40 to £23 for an average price of £17.74.
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
Try photoetch in 1/700 then! I'm building the Revell 1/720 Prinz Eugen and compared to 1/600, it is much more difficult. This will be my first and last ship in that scale (I'm only building this as I built this as a kid). Give me 1/600 any day.
I believe 1/600 scale was established by wargamers, who also use 1/1200 scale. Aurora chose this scale in the 1950's, followed by Airfix in 1960 with HMS Cossack. Annoyingly, Revell chose 1/570 scale, which is 2000 times greater than 1/1,140,000 scale, used in old maps. I believe the oldest Revell 1/570 kit is the Bismarck released in 1963. This is three years after Airfix's first 1/600 release, so Revell chose not to follow Airfix.
Later, the Japanese model makers chose 1/700 knowing full well that Airfix had established 1/600 scale for their ships. Its unfortunately all water under the bridge now, with 1/700 dominating small ship models and 1/350 large ship models. Only Airfix and a limited number of kits from a few other manufacturers keep 1/600 scale alive today.
|
XN923
|
It would be nice if Warspite was in Jutland configuration rather than the very ugly (IMHO) WW2 spec. A good compromise would be some new sprues with WW1 upperworks.
|
XN923
|
I agree about 1/700, it just seems that little bit too small. Even the largest warships are not unmanageable in 1/600, while a destroyer in 1/700 feels like an N gauge train - fiddly, and small for the sake of it.
1/350 works for ships like pre-Dreadnoughts but is a bit big for things like Bismarck and Hood, where 1/400 is more manageable but still gives plenty of scope for detailing. I think 1/350 is unassailable as the 'larger' scale now though and we just have to live with it. I hope Airfix doesn't abandon 1/600, but the presence of a 1/700 ship in the catalogue looks ominous.
|
Beaufighter
|
@ XN293 -
Yes, I think that's exactly the sort of thing they should think about doing. The range of 1/600 WW1 battleships available from Airfix is essentially four - Iron Duke, Warspite, Repulse, and Hood (just!).
This is not a bad total in fact, but Repulse has gone, so we're down to three, and the others are very old moulds. If any were to be reworked / retooled, I think it would make a lot of sense to use the opportunity to create alternative parts with a WW1 and WW2 configuration. It ought to add quite a few sales for relatively little incremental tooling cost.
Tamigawa have been doing this for years - the same kit of Kongo is in four different boxes as, in addition, Hiei, Haruna, and Kirishima. Ludicrously, the plastic is the same even though the subject ships were not in fact exact sisters - the funnel configurations varied.
While they're about it I'd also like a WW1 and WW2 version of Furious, the former in loony quasi-carrier mode with one 18-inch gun and the latter looking a bit more normal. Given the significance of carriers in WW2 and thereafter, it is a bit odd that there are only two RN carriers in the range.
I'm still not hugely optimistic, but then I wouldn't have been optimistic about the Beam Engine being re-released either, for the same reasons. I would dearly love to be wrong. Stephen's maths make sense, but does it follow that if you can sell 10,000 units of a reissued Iron Duke, you're going to sell 10,000 of HMS Dreadnought? I don't know - 7,500 of your Iron Duke sales might be pent-up demand for any WW1 subject that has built up over the decade or so since the kit was last out. Once that demand is met, there may be less interest in further such items!
I've no idea, and as we don't have the sales figures, there's no way to know. It makes me wonder how much historical MI the Hornby folk actually have to guide these decisions.
|
DavidM
|
To get a Jutland-era Warspite (and Barham, Malaya etc.) from the old Airfix kit would require an almost total remould, so they'd be better off starting from scratch.
But I agree about a Furious (and I'm sure that I've posted a similar wish here before). A few years ago I modified some 1/300 ships to represent the various phases of Furious' development (adding aircraft to the deck was fun). The result certainly pleased my girlfriend's father (now deceased) who served for a short time on her).
David
|
DavidM
|
| XN923 wrote: | | I hope Airfix doesn't abandon 1/600, but the presence of a 1/700 ship in the catalogue looks ominous. |
Sticking with 1/32 for military subjects in the face of the industry-standard 1/35 didn't do Airfix any favours back in the 70s and I hope the mistake doesn't get repeated here.
David
|
XN923
|
| DavidM wrote: | | XN923 wrote: | | I hope Airfix doesn't abandon 1/600, but the presence of a 1/700 ship in the catalogue looks ominous. |
Sticking with 1/32 for military subjects in the face of the industry-standard 1/35 didn't do Airfix any favours back in the 70s and I hope the mistake doesn't get repeated here.
David |
An interesting point... One might almost suggest that Far East manufacturers deliberately invented new scales to level the playing field before flooding the market with new kits. Though I have heard that 1/35 came about because of a misunderstanding between the figures '2' and '5'.
On the other hand, as has been pointed out, there's a lot less of an 'industry standard' in ships anyway. 1/700 has been around long enough without driving 1/600 out of the market, but it will if there aren't any new kits. Crunch time really, as I wonder how much life there is left in the existing 1/600 moulds...?
|
peebeep
|
| XN923 wrote: | | 1/700 has been around long enough without driving 1/600 out of the market, but it will if there aren't any new kits. |
That is very much the point - when did anybody release a new tool kit in 1/600? Like it or not - and it is obviously anathema to Airfix Tifosi - it would seem that new tool kits in 1/600 are less rather than more likely.
peebeep
|
DavidM
|
Carrying the 1/600 question a bit further, which other companies issued ships in this scale, other than Airfix? Even Frog opted for (IIRC) 1/500.
David
|
peebeep
|
I think the question is academic. I just did a brief experiment using the Hannant's search engine:
1/600 = 15 hits
1/700 = 289 hits
peebeep
|
XN923
|
| peebeep wrote: | That is very much the point - when did anybody release a new tool kit in 1/600? Like it or not - and it is obviously anathema to Airfix Tifosi - it would seem that new tool kits in 1/600 are less rather than more likely.
peebeep |
I asked this same question a little while ago and was surprised by the result - 2004, for Airfix's Queen Mary 2.
|
XN923
|
| peebeep wrote: | I think the question is academic. I just did a brief experiment using the Hannant's search engine:
1/600 = 15 hits
1/700 = 289 hits
peebeep |
Just did this same test on eBay. Results were:
1/600 = 125 hits
1/700 = 454 hits
I think a result <1:4 is not bad considering, and definitely not academic. Also worth noting that not all of the 1/700 returns were ship kits - there were space shuttles, space stations and C-17s in there as well.
I wonder what it would be if you tried the same thing with 1/350 vs 1/400?
|
peebeep
|
| XN923 wrote: | | I think a result <1:4 is not bad considering, and definitely not academic. |
Interesting, but what is new and what is simply being re-cycled? Being a pragmatist I see that result as a no-brainer for anybody in sales/marketing - you can't run away and hide from the fact that 1/700 dominates.
It's not something that pleases me personally, but I see it as a matter of fact. I'd be delighted if there were new 1/600 kits issued, but if you were to ask me if it's likely I'd suggest it's more likely that somebody will find Lord Lucan or Shergar.
peebeep
|
tempestfan
|
| peebeep wrote: |
That is very much the point - when did anybody release a new tool kit in 1/600?
peebeep |
I'd say Airfix - Repulse, '81 or '82...EDIT: that is, before the QM2, of course
Many of the moulds were rather worn-out in the 70s already, but on the other hand the majority of the Airfix ships was not available for 20 or 25 years - Campbeltown, Daring, Cossack, Hotspur, Narvik, Manxman, Rommel... you name it. So there might be a little more life left in them.
|
tempestfan
|
| DavidM wrote: | Carrying the 1/600 question a bit further, which other companies issued ships in this scale, other than Airfix? Even Frog opted for (IIRC) 1/500.
David |
...but that scale is even more oddball. Except for maybe some Japanese kits, no one followed this.
|
walrus
|
| Quote: | | likely I'd suggest it's more likely that somebody will find Lord Lucan or Shergar. |
wonder what odds i could get for someone finding Lord Lucan riding Shergar
|
tempestfan
|
| peebeep wrote: |
Interesting, but what is new and what is simply being re-cycled? Being a pragmatist I see that result as a no-brainer for anybody in sales/marketing - you can't run away and hide from the fact that 1/700 dominates.
peebeep |
Maybe after all it doesn't, at least for "Western" Ships ? I admit that this is abolutely not my ballgame, but some 20 or so years ago, there were basically endless variations of about every ship the Imp. JapN used, but many of the "Western" subjects were not kitted at all or below par. Back then, there was only one RN carrier IIRC, and being a rather old Aoshima mould, not overwhelming. Similar for the Essexes. This may have changed with some kits of the '90s and 2000s to some extent, but maybe the situation is ambivalent to some extent. And taking into consideration the price, which is usually rather hefty with the 700s, there may be some room for high-quality 600s kits at a sensible price. After all, Revell continues to amaze me with their super aircraft kits at a price that would give you one Tamyia wing. Something on these lines could work for Airfix. A 600th Essex, WWII RN carrier and 60s Ark would be nice.
|
XN923
|
A fair question tempestfan - which of the following RN ships are available in 1/700 in a mainstream version?
Hood
Ark Royal
Renown
Repulse
Warspite
Iron Duke
Nelson
Rodney
Victorious
Campbeltown
Amazon-class
Devonshire-class
Belfast
Leander-class
Manxman
Cossack
County-class
Tiger
Daring
Fearless
Hotspur
A few of those I can answer for myself - Hood and Renown/Repulse for example, but what of the others?
I see that Kitech released some 1/600 ships - were these Airfix reboxings? There is also an Arii Yamato.
|
peebeep
|
| tempestfan wrote: | | Maybe after all it doesn't, at least for "Western" Ships ? |
There were always plenty of US subjects, with a smattering of RN and DKM, in fact the 'big four' Japanese manufacturers covered most of the WWII period heavy units from these navys. Now take a look at the Trumpeter catalogue, it's awash (groan) with US, RN, DKM and USSR ship kits, even a French Richelieu in the pipeline.
peebeep
|
DavidM
|
Besides the Hood and Repulse, Tamiya do both the Nelson and Rodney, also KGV and PoW, E and V/W class destroyers and I think Trumpeter is threatening a Tribal (Eskimo?).
Then we can add a few Lease/Lend ships like the Escort carrier (Tamiya's Bogue ex Pit-Road) and also Captain Class frigates (Pit-Road).
David
|
tempestfan
|
| peebeep wrote: |
There were always plenty of US subjects, with a smattering of RN and DKM, in fact the 'big four' Japanese manufacturers covered most of the WWII period heavy units from these navys. Now take a look at the Trumpeter catalogue, it's awash (groan) with US, RN, DKM and USSR ship kits, even a French Richelieu in the pipeline.
peebeep |
IIRC, the Essexes at least have some accuracy issues, and many of the first generation moulds are on a par (agewise) with some of Airfix's later kits, so probably not considered fully up to current standards. My Aoshima Tsiranui (one of my first kits) definitely is crude. Trump kits are, in my experience, rather upmarket. Compare this with an Airfix S. 4 or 5 Battleship.
|
peebeep
|
| tempestfan wrote: | | IIRC, the Essexes at least have some accuracy issues, and many of the first generation moulds are on a par (agewise) with some of Airfix's later kits, so probably not considered fully up to current standards. |
What else would you expect from tooling that is now 30-40 years old? If you're looking for state of the art, buy Trumpy, which leads me to...
| tempestfan wrote: | | Trump kits are, in my experience, rather upmarket. Compare this with an Airfix S. 4 or 5 Battleship. |
Surely this is what the market now demands? I have a Trumpy Hornet and Bismark and on the sprue they appear to blow anything Airfix have ever done ship wise into the weeds and are at least as good, if not better, than anything previously released by the 'big four'.
peebeep
|
DavidM
|
Two things:
I've found the Trumpeter Eskimo on Hannant's site (bit pricey)
And Tamiya also now have the moulds for the Pit-Road 'ship bearing some resemblence to an O Class destroyer' to which some new parts have been added that are no help at all. How happy I was when I found that out.
David
|
tempestfan
|
| peebeep wrote: |
What else would you expect from tooling that is now 30-40 years old? If you're looking for state of the art, buy Trumpy, which leads me to... |
Exactly this. But basically often Airfix gets a bashing for continuing to offer tired old stuff, when many others do the same (though some moulds may have been replaced in the Waterline range).
| peebeep wrote: | Surely this is what the market now demands? I have a Trumpy Hornet and Bismark and on the sprue they appear to blow anything Airfix have ever done ship wise into the weeds and are at least as good, if not better, than anything previously released by the 'big four'.
peebeep |
I don't know. Does the market ? Or does a part of it that is willing and able to spend huge amounts of money for their kits ? There are different tastes, but I personally have never liked that style of superkit. Maybe Trumpeter are better with ships, but some of their expensive large-scale planes appear to have serious issues (Thud for example) with accuracy, let alone their tendency for, hm, overstated rivet detailing. If the same applied to ships, what would be the use of an expensive kit if much of the great detail has to be replaced cause it's inaccurate ? I hasten to add that I have no idea if those problems apply to the ships, again. I personally prefer a cheaper, less detailed basically accurate kit that leaves room for improvement and personalisation. But then again, that's taste.
|
DavidM
|
Tamiya get plenty of stick for continuing to push tired old stuff in other forums, don't worry about that.
And while we're at it, perhaps Revell of Germany could look in their stores for the moulds of the Matchbox Kelly and Exeter, two more to add to the RN list. Exeter did go out to Alanger for a while, but hopefully the moulds survived the excursion. They needn't bother with the Ariadne, judging by the example I have.
David
|
Loll
|
| walrus wrote: | | Quote: | | likely I'd suggest it's more likely that somebody will find Lord Lucan or Shergar. |
wonder what odds i could get for someone finding Lord Lucan riding Shergar  |
About the same as Lord Lucan working on an Airfix kit whilst riding Shergar ( I thought they found the remains of the horse ?)
|
XN923
|
Too right. I think Furious was a tremendously important ship, and the whole class was fascinating in whatever configuration you care to choose. Think of poor old Glorious getting caught by Scharnhorst and Gneisenau off Norway with no 'planes on deck, and Furious 'giving it 'em back' in '44 with the Tirpitz raids at Kaa Fjord. Why have their been no mainstream models of these fantastic ships??
|
XN923
|
| DavidM wrote: | To get a Jutland-era Warspite (and Barham, Malaya etc.) from the old Airfix kit would require an almost total remould, so they'd be better off starting from scratch.
|
As far as I can see you'd only be able to use the hull... actually, I presume torpedo bulges etc would have to be modified or removed. OK, scratch that. Let's have a remould please Airfix!
|
Ratch
|
So is 1/600 a dying scale
|
walrus
|
| Quote: | | ( I thought they found the remains of the horse ?) |
Lord Lucon rode Shergar too hard, poor thing
|
Ratch
|
|
DavidM
|
| Ratch wrote: | So is 1/600 a dying scale  |
Now there's a hard question to answer.
Not dying but one who's future needs to be very carefully considered. Personally I think Airfix would be forcing themselves into a niche market if they carry on with it, but the mourners aren't gathering quite yet. There are still plenty of people around who would buy as this thread has demonstrated.
Depends on the market Airfix wish to aim at in the end.
David
|
peebeep
|
| Ratch wrote: | So is 1/600 a dying scale  |
As long as tooling exists from which kits can be manufactured, no, but it would take a brave decision for anybody to decide tooling up new kits.
I would regard it as a constructive dismissal, something it doesn't really deserve, but it's happened regardless.
peebeep
|
XN923
|
| Ratch wrote: | So is 1/600 a dying scale  |
The future is in Airfix's hands. It's not dead yet, but as has been stated, the scale is at a bit of a crossroads. With only one new tool in nearly 30 years, and many of the remaining ones long past their best, the only real options are to abandon it completely, or commit to it fully and tool several new ships, with others planned further down the line.
Here's my suggested lineup for a revived 1/600
HMS Dreadnought (of course!)
HMS Daring (new)
HMS Queen Elizabeth (CVF)
HMS Furious
Satsuma (first Japanese 'Dreadnought')
USS South Carolina (first American 'Dreadnought')
HMS Invincible (world's first battle-cruiser)
Better add something WW2 German to that, and frankly I'm struggling to think of a ship that hasn't been done to death. The only 'battleships' not kitted repeatedly and ad nauseum in any scale are the two pre-Dreadnoughts still kicking around because of the Versailles treaty - and who'd buy those? Perhaps an Emden, Leipzig, Konigsberg or Nurnburg class light cruiser?
|
T16S
|
At IPMS Huddersfield I was totally dismayed by the lack of floaty things. Huge numbers of German tanks and a good showing of Allied stuff. Little quantity of military trucks but what there was was superb. Lots of aircraft but majority WWII. Some wonderful Vee bombers though. Where are the ship modellers out there? One outstanding floaty model was a Hospital ship at 1:700 I think- a superb scratch build and I think it won the competition.
There seems to be only a few floaty modellers out there- so we should support people like Remy (Orionv) all the more- keeping the flame alive.
cheer Stuart
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
There are a number of new kits still being made in 1/600 scale. See list below.
Airfix/Heller Queen Mary 2
Academy Titanic
Aeroplast HMS Cossack/Tartar
Arii USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson
Arii IJN Yamato/Musashi
Kangnam/Lee USS Enterprise
Kangnam/Lee USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson (same as Arii?)
Kitech/Zhengdefu Charles de Gaulle
Nichomo IJN Yamato/Musashi (same as Arii?)
|
XN923
|
| Steven Pietrobon wrote: | There are a number of new kits still being made in 1/600 scale. See list below.
Academy Titanic |
Academy does a 1/600 Titanic? Why did Airfix choose to go with the 1/700 one in the new catalogue?
|
tempestfan
|
| DavidM wrote: | Tamiya get plenty of stick for continuing to push tired old stuff in other forums, don't worry about that.
And while we're at it, perhaps Revell of Germany could look in their stores for the moulds of the Matchbox Kelly and Exeter, two more to add to the RN list. Exeter did go out to Alanger for a while, but hopefully the moulds survived the excursion. They needn't bother with the Ariadne, judging by the example I have.
David |
Good to hear...
For some reason, Revell do not seem to be interested in re-releasing some MB kits for reasons not at all obvious to me. Quality can't be the decisive consideration, as they have done all the 32nd a/c except the 109 which I would rate best of the bunch, with the possible exception of the Puma. They have done many of the other a/c kits but not the biplanes (majority thereof) and the Twin Otter. And the only ship I can recall (still in the black MB boxing ) is the San Diego. I can't tell a Missouri from a Yamato, but the kits that I have do not look all that bad, and most of them surely haven't been done to death, or have they ?
|
peebeep
|
| XN923 wrote: | | Academy does a 1/600 Titanic? Why did Airfix choose to go with the 1/700 one in the new catalogue? |
Because this is the scale that's been chosen for future releases?!
Academy does Titanics in 1/720, 1/700, 1/600 and 1/400.
peebeep
|
tempestfan
|
| Steven Pietrobon wrote: | There are a number of new kits still being made in 1/600 scale. See list below.
Airfix/Heller Queen Mary 2
Academy Titanic
Aeroplast HMS Cossack/Tartar
Arii USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson
Arii IJN Yamato/Musashi
Kangnam/Lee USS Enterprise
Kangnam/Lee USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson (same as Arii?)
Kitech/Zhengdefu Charles de Gaulle
Nichomo IJN Yamato/Musashi (same as Arii?) |
"New" is relatively relative. I don't think Arii has many own moulds, so most likely those are older moulds from another mfr. bought in by Arii. Maybe Otaki ?
|
DavidM
|
| tempestfan wrote: | | I can't tell a Missouri from a Yamato, but the kits that I have do not look all that bad, and most of them surely haven't been done to death, or have they ? |
Several of the MB subjects have been covered more recently by other manufacturers (like the San Diego and Indianapolis), but the Exeter and Kelly (and the Ariadne) certainly haven't appeared in plastic since. MB's German destroyer is also apparently streets ahead of the Skywave/Tamiya one.
David
|
peebeep
|
| tempestfan wrote: | | They have done many of the other a/c kits but not the biplanes (majority thereof) and the Twin Otter. |
Twin Otter
Heyford
Walrus
Swordfish
I think it's simply a matter of time before the old MB catalogue gets rotated, that will hopefully include the ships and the Purple Series biplanes.
peebeep
|
tempestfan
|
| peebeep wrote: | | tempestfan wrote: | | They have done many of the other a/c kits but not the biplanes (majority thereof) and the Twin Otter. |
Twin Otter
Heyford
Walrus
Swordfish
I think it's simply a matter of time before the old MB catalogue gets rotated, that will hopefully include the ships and the Purple Series biplanes.
peebeep |
Thanks for the update Paul, I was aware of the Swordfish and relatively recent Heyford (and I've also seen the Seafox, so they indeed seem to be working their way there), but the Twotter is new to me, for this year ? Nice kit ! I'd love to see Fury, P-12 and Siskin back.
|
XN923
|
| peebeep wrote: | | XN923 wrote: | | Academy does a 1/600 Titanic? Why did Airfix choose to go with the 1/700 one in the new catalogue? |
Because this is the scale that's been chosen for future releases?!
Academy does Titanics in 1/720, 1/700, 1/600 and 1/400.
peebeep |
That's what worries me...
Unless the 1/700 kit is a gem and the 1/600 a dog... Maybe the writing is on the wall for 1/600. Can we get a statement to this effect from Airfix?
Surprising that they released a new tool kit in this scale relatively recently, and now appear to be moving towards dropping it. Surely a 1/600 Titanic would have sat that much better next to the QM2.
|
tempestfan
|
| XN923 wrote: |
That's what worries me...
Unless the 1/700 kit is a gem and the 1/600 a dog... Maybe the writing is on the wall for 1/600. Can we get a statement to this effect from Airfix?
Surprising that they released a new tool kit in this scale relatively recently, and now appear to be moving towards dropping it. Surely a 1/600 Titanic would have sat that much better next to the QM2. |
My feeling is that they have not really decided which road to go. OK, 350th and 700th are somewhat complimentary, but then 400th is much too close to the former (or is the range completely dropped again ? Sorry for not following this aspect more closely), and then there's also 600th in between. A bit too much scales IMHO for a limited number of kits, this is somehat Revell'esque (from their older days), and I think it may leave some people somewhat confused. If the "Japanese" road is taken, then it may be advisable to have a clean sheet approach and concentrate on the two scales - and consequently drop the other scales completely. Such a situation would also probably make it easier to explain to the bean counting fraternity why money has to be spent for a, say, Victorious. I'd bet there will never be a new tool Viccie by Airfix as long as the 600th line is continued.
|
orionv
|
I agree...
|
wookie
|
| peebeep wrote: |
Because this is the scale that's been chosen for future releases?!
peebeep |
I sincerely hope not! But if that's the case, I suppose I can reconsile myself with the fact that with the kits that are currently available, there are years' worth of conversion possibilities. The by Leander Class alone can produce the basis for 26 Leanders, (more if you look at things like the Indian UDAYGIRI class), 12 Rothesays 6 Whitbys and to a degree 8 Cat/Cathedral class. So that should keep me going for a good few years! Not to mention the Belfast/Tiger combination that can produce at least a dozen different Town/Colony class cruisers.
Quite what I would do with the spare DLG and T21 kits that came with the Leanders after I've done the 8 respectively of those I'm not too sure!
|
XN923
|
| wookie wrote: |
Quite what I would do with the spare DLG and T21 kits that came with the Leanders after I've done the 8 respectively of those I'm not too sure! |
Funny you should mention that, because I am currently running a FREE DLG and T21 disposal service
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
Yes, I was very disappointed that Airfix chose the 1/700 Titanic instead of 1/600. The 1/600 gets a very good review on the Titanic Model Web Site.
"Quite possibly, this may be the finest ocean liner model on the market in styrene and in this scale."
According to this review, the 1/700 kit is aimed at a basic skill level, which is maybe why the 1/600 kit was not chosen (which is much more detailed and aimed at an intermediate skill level). I already have the Academy 1/600 kit which comes in a fairly large size box.
|
XN923
|
Seems like Airfix is hedging. It does sound like they have gone for this kit aimed mainly at the younger/less skilled market (Titanic is more of a mass market subject after all) rather than as a statement of intent on future scales - although the fact that it is new in the catalogue at the same time as a newly-tooled 1/350 scale ship still looks like the winds of change may be blowing.
As I noted before, I like 1/600 and am not a fan of 1/700 - it either seems too toy-like or too fiddly depending on the detail level of the kit. I'm not a big ship model builder really but my favourite scale is 1/600 as it seems to suit the size of ship I like to build.
|
Digs
|
| DavidM wrote: | Carrying the 1/600 question a bit further, which other companies issued ships in this scale, other than Airfix? Even Frog opted for (IIRC) 1/500.
David |
From: http://www.quuxuum.org/rajens_list/rajen.html
[My comments in italics]
Arii/Otaki: GENERAL COMMENTS: For some unknown reason, ARII battleships are in 1/600, their carriers are in 1/800, and everything else is in 1/700. Go figure. Many of their 1/600 and 1/800 scale ships seem to be re-issues of Otaki kits. Apparently, some ARII kits were released in England under the brand name "Hypa"
Enterprise (USN CVN-65) [1/600] {93381} (Cold)
# Iowa-class (USN BB-61) {132} [1/600] (WW2-Mod)
Editor's Notes: See Geoffry Woods' review under Wisconsin.
This kit has been issued at various times as:
* Iowa (BB-61) (kit 132)
* New Jersey (BB-62) (kit 130)
* Missouri (BB-63) (kit 133)
* Wisconsin (BB-64) (kit 134)
# Musashi (IJN BB) [1/600] {122} (WW2) FH
Presumably the same kit as the Yamato. Unknown whether the instructions account for the differences between the ships. (DRW)
Aurora:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Aurora, was in business from 1952 to 1977. They started in Brooklyn, New York, but the moved to West Hempstead, (Long Island), New York fairly early. They were once among the leading manufacturers in the business, but they went out of the plastic model business in 1975. They made some decent surface ships in 1/600 scale, (sadly, they were not always accurate below the waterline)
Bainbridge (USN DLGN-25/CGN-25) {717} [1/600] (Cold) FH
Bismarck (DKM BB) {715} [1/600] (WW2)
Enterprise (USN CV-6) {720} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Forrestal (USN CVA-59) {701} [1/600] (Cold) FH
(Also released as Independence (USN CVA-62) and Saratoga (USN CVA-60))
Graf Spee (DKM CA) {709} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Guadalcanal (USN LPH-7) {718} [1/600] (Cold) FH
Iowa (USN BB-61) {705} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Editor's Note: This kit dates back to at least 1962. It has been issued as
* Iowa (kit 705)
* New Jersey (kit 724)
* Missouri (kit 723)
King George V (RN BB) {712} [1/600] (WW2)
St. Paul (USN Baltimore class CA-73) {703} [1/600] (WW2/Mod)
Yamato (IJN BB) {713} [1/600?] (WW2) FH
Prince of Wales (RN BB) {NF-4002} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Editor's Note: Presumably, reissue of Airfix King George V kit. (DRW)
# Repulse (RN BC) {NF-4001} [1/600] (WW1/WW2) FH
Editor's Note: Reissue of Airfix Repulse kit. (DRW)
Hap Dong:
GENERAL COMMENTS: A South Korean company. Apparently, this is the same company as the model aircraft manufacturer Ace.
# Enterprise (USN CVN-65) [1/600] {S125} (Cold)
Editor's Note: See notes under Kangnam Enterprise.
Hawk/Testors:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Chicago based Hawk used to be a significant US injection molded polystyrene model kit maufacturer, but were bought out by Testors in the early 1970s. In addition to their kits of cars and aircraft, they made at least some ships. These were re-issued by Testors in 2003.
Coast Guard Cutter (USCG Cutter) {12-39} [1/600] (WW2) FH
LST (USN LST-493) {11-39} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Editor's Note: Hull is said to be 6.5 inches long. Box art shows LST-493. Testors reissued this kit in 2003.
Heller:
La Couronne {066} [1/600]
Editor's Note: Said to be 147mm long.
Eagle (USCG Sail Trainer) [1/600] (Cold)
Editor's Note: Said to be 149mm long.
Gorch Fock (German Sail Trainer) [1/600] (Cold)
Editor's Note: Said to be 149mm long. Possibly the same as Heller's Eagle kit.
le Phenix (sailing ship) [1/600] FH
Editor's Note: Said to be 138mm long when completed.
Royal Louis (French Ship of the Line) [1/600] (Sail)
Editor's Note: Said to be 142mm long
Kangnam:
GENERAL COMMENTS: A South Korean company. I'm not sure, but they may be connected to Hap Dong somehow. I seem to recall that my Kangnam 1/600 Enterprise model was originally sold to me as a Hapdong product, but I can't find the records on it. (DRW)
Enterprise (USN CVN-65) {12000} [1/600] (Cold) FH
New Jersey (USN BB-62) [1/600] (Cold) FH
# Iowa-class (USN BB-61) [1/600] {03601} (WW2-Mod)
Editor's Notes: Presumably the same kit as the Arii Iowa class.
This kit has been issued at various times as:
* Iowa (BB-61) (kit 03601)
* New Jersey (BB-62) (kit 03602)
* Missouri (BB-63) (kit 03603)
* Wisconsin (BB-64) (kit 03604)
Lindberg:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Lindberg was founded sometime in 1933, and is thus one of the oldest hobby companies still in business. I have no idea what their product line was back in the 1930s, but it probably did not include plastic model ships.
They were formerly based in Skokie, Illinois. They are now based in Toledo, Ohio.
The butt of many a joke for many years, Lindberg is now starting to turn itself around under its new owners, Craft House.
Biloxi (USN CL-80) {881} [1/600] (WW2) FH
POOR. See Cleveland Class. (below)
Cleveland class (USN CL-55) {777M} [1/600] (WW2) FH
POOR. 47 parts, and none of them are good. The hull is wrong, the deck is wrong, the guns are wrong, and the molded-into-the-deck light AA guns are really offensive.
This kit has a particularly bad case of Lindberg steel panel lines. They are particularly offensive on the deck, which should be wood planked.
Some issues of this kit are motorized.
This one is only for kids or masochistic 1/600 fanatics.
MPC:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Michigan-based Model Products Corporation (MPC) used to be a major manufacturer of plastic model car kits. MPC was founded by former AMT executive George Toteff after he left AMT in 1963. For the most part, MPC didn't make ships. MPC did have a longstanding relationship with Airfix, and some Airfix car kits were released under the MPC label, and vice versa. MPC also re-issued some Airfix ship kits. Apparently, there was a flurry of Airfix re-issues around 1982. Comments that apply to Airfix kits also apply here.
[re-released many of the Airfix kits so I've not bothered listing them]
Monogram:
GENERAL COMMENTS: Monogram was founded in 1945 in Chicago. They are still in the Chicago area, in Morton Grove, Illinois. Monogram operated as an independent company, until the debacle of their slot-racing sets in the mid-60's forced them to sell out to Mattel, Inc. (the Barbie doll folks) When Aurora left the plastic model business in 1975, Monogram bought most of their molds. Mattel owned Monogram until a leveraged buyout in about 1984 made that company independent again. Monogram merged with US rival Revell in 1986. They still use both brand names.
Bismarck (DKM BB) [1/615] (WW2) FH
Editor's Note: 16 inch (406mm) "box scale" kit
Forrestal class (USN CVA-59) {3504} [1/600] (Cold) FH
OK. Re-issue (circa 1978) of the Aurora Forrestal, but with a much improved aircraft set, including F-4s, A-5s, A-3s and others. 30 airplanes, 3 helos total.
Also released as Independence, Saratoga
Sea Quest DSV (Fictional SSN) [1/600] (Cold) FH
Editor's Note: Issued circa 1994 in conjunction with the sci-fi TV series "Sea Quest DSV". Said to be 19.5 inches long when complete.
Nichimo:
GENERAL COMMENTS:Nichimo seems to support a number of scale standards. They have a line of 1/500 ships, a line of 1/200 ships, and a line of 30cm "box scale" kits. (i.e. all ships are 30 cm long) Many Nichimo kits are designed to be motorized.
Musashi (IJN BB Yamato-class) [1/600] {U6002} (WW2) WL/FH
Yamato (IJN BB Yamato-class) [1/600] {U6001} (WW2) FH/WL
Presumably same as 1/600 Musashi, possibly lacking a few conversion parts.
OzMods:
GENERAL COMMENTS: An Australian model company that produces a line of resin models.
Duchess (RN/RAN Daring class DD) [1/600] {OM6001} (Cold) WL
Voyager (RAN Daring class DD) [1/600] {OM6002} (Cold) WL
PT Dockyard:
GENERAL COMMENTS:Small resin kits of WW1 and WW2 coastal craft. Meant for wargaming, but with some work and added detail can be made into good display models. All are 1/600 scale.
# 1200 ton freighter {MR3} (WW2)
# 250 ton Coaster (generic freighter) {MR1} (WW2)
# 700 ton Coaster (generic straight stem freighter) {MR5} (WW2)
# 800 ton German Coaster (generic freighter) {MR4} (WW2)
# 40' CMB (RN MTB) {SF1} (WW1)
# 46' Daihatsu barge (IJN) {JN1} (WW2)
# PT 369 (USN Scott Paine 70' design) {US9} (WW2)
# PT 59 (USN Elco 77' gunboat conversion) {US10} (WW2)
# 78' Higgins PT (USN) {US2} (WW2)
Includes parts for early and late boats.
# 80' Elco PT (USN) {US1} (WW2)
1944 version.
# "Thunderbolt" PT (USN Elco 80' w/ quad 20mm) {US8} (WW2)
# 83' Cutter (USCG) {US11} (WW2)
# 110' SC (USN wood subchaser) {US5} (WW2)
# 173' PC (USN steel-hull subchaser) {US5} (WW2)
# ASRC "crash boat" (USN 63' motor boat) {US4} (WW2)
# French Chasseur CH14 (Free French subchaser) {FR4} (WW2)
# LM7 (Imperial German MTBs) {SF2} (WW1)
# MTB 5-6 (Norweigian) {SF2} (NW1)
60' Vosper design. Also operated by RN as MTB 71-72.
# PGM 1 (USN gunboat) {US6} (WW2)
Gunboat version of 110' subchaser.
# Shinyo suicide boats (IJN) {JN3} (WW2)
# Subchaser (USN wooden subchaser) {SF3} (WW1)
# Two-master schooner {MR6} (steel/WW1/WW2)
With optional armament to make Axis "Q-Schooner" decoy escort craft.
# Tanker barge (generic 150' transport) {MR7} (WW2)
# TM 4 (Dutch MTB) {NE1} (WW2)
# Type "C" Armored Gunboat (IJN) {JN4} (WW2)
# Type T-38 (IJN MTB) {JN2} (WW2)
# Vantul (Romanian MTB) {RM1} (WW2)
# Viscocul (Romanian MTB) {RM2} (WW2)
# VTB 8 (Early French/Free French MTB) {FR1} (WW2)
# VTB 11-12 (French MTB) {FR2} (WW2)
Taken over as MGB 98-99 by RN.
# VTB 23 (British-built French MTB) {FR3} (WW2)
# "Tiger Fleet" partisan boat (Yugoslav) {YG1} (WW2)
Revell:
Bismarck (DKM BB) {H-350/05036} [1/570] (WW2) FH
The kit scales out to 1/588 for 814 or 1/595 for a length of 823, depending on your sources.
United States (US Ocean Liner) {H-332} [1/600] FH
Thoroughbred:
Manufacturer of metal 1/600 ships. US Civil War unless otherwise noted. Small, meant for wargaming, all waterline. Useful in dioramas, can be detailed with parts they sell and scratchwork. Some models serve for entire class, like USS Passaic.
[Have not bothered with their extensive list of ships - not really kits as we tend to think of them?]
Tom's Modelworks:
GENERAL COMMENTS: A small resin manufacturer.
DeGaulle (French CVN) [1/600] (Modern)
____________________________________
Quite a list eh? Even if many of them are the same kit recycled and some may well be well-nigh impossible to find. Nevertheless, enough to keep even the diehard 1/600 fans busy for a while. I guess I count as one, as the scale alone means I have a copy of the Testor's LST and some unidentifiable Asian manufactured Bismarck! Both look fairly dreadful on the sprues though so caveat emptor and don't blame me if the list prompts you into buying something even worse than the Airfix Rommel...
Paul
|
feanor
|
Ayup Paul...
Thanks for that Comprehensive list.
Still, if i find i desire another Floaty thing to go with my Frog Repulse, i shall consult you...
Cheers.
|
tempestfan
|
| Digs wrote: | [Aurora:
King George V (RN BB) {712} [1/600] (WW2)
Prince of Wales (RN BB) {NF-4002} [1/600] (WW2) FH
Editor's Note: Presumably, reissue of Airfix King George V kit. (DRW)
# Repulse (RN BC) {NF-4001} [1/600] (WW1/WW2) FH
Editor's Note: Reissue of Airfix Repulse kit. (DRW)
|
Thanks very much for the list, Paul ! For the record, the Aurora KGV class and Repulse can't be Airfix kits as these were only released after Airfix's bankruptcy in '81 - unless s/o used the Aurora trademark for a later than that re-release, as has happened with a quite recent "Frog" issue of the Repulse (and maybe KGV) from Singapore.
I'd also suspect that the kits under Arii, especially if from Otaki moulds, are only around 600th. The same goes for the Heller Cadet sail ships.
Revell had more than justthe Bismarck in nominal 570th, there also were various KGV-class boxings, and not surprisingly a Tirpitz.
|
tempestfan
|
As there are a number of kits in the Airfix ship range with sisters, how about the possibilities of doing extra parts to depict them ? E.g., could KGV be transformed into PoW, DoY or even the two great unknowns, Anson and Howe (had they built a HMS Bruford and Wakeman, they could've formed "Force Yes"...almost) with reasonable effort ? Or Rodney, Renown, Hipper, Lützow, Scheer...?
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
Airfix has done that for Aircraft and Tank kits, but not yet for any ship kits. The closest was getting a Tirpitz from the Bismarck kit. I think its a good idea.
|
tempestfan
|
| Steven Pietrobon wrote: | | The closest was getting a Tirpitz from the Bismarck kit. I think its a good idea. | ...but this may not have been the best choice for doing this, since they did very little changes. They added a number af small Flak guns thatwere not present in early Bismarcks and probably don't belong there. As far as I can see, the kits are identical for a Bismarck in '41 and a Tirpitz in presumably '44, by which time it was heavily upgunned with light Flak, IIRC.
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
A Ukraine model company Master Box Ltd has announced a new line of 1/700 WWI battleships, including HMS Dreadnought. This will be the first plastic model kit of this famous battleship. Up to this time, this company has only made 1/35 figures and vehicles. Their kits seem to be high quality, considering the awards they have won. Their line will be based on ships that fought in the Battle of Jutland, but HMS Dreadnought did not take part in that battle. The other ships announced in the line include all four of the German König class ships, SMS König, Grosser Kurfust, Markgraf, and Kronprinz Wilhelm.
Well, unless Airfix already have a 1/700 HMS Dreadnought in the pipeline, I think this scuttles any plan for Airfix to make a 1/700 HMS Dreadnought. At 1/700 the Dreadnought and König are only 229 and 251 mm long, respectively. To give you an idea of how small that is, the Airfix 1/600 HMS Ajax is 282 mm long!
I think we still can petition for a HMS Dreadnought at the more sensible 1/600 scale. This will give a length of 268 mm, still smaller than HMS Ajax, but 39 mm (1.5") longer than the 1/700 model. SMS König would come out at 292 mm at 1/600 which would be 10 mm longer than HMS Ajax.
|
Brews
|
I would say, Steven, that if Airfix released a 1:600 HMS Dreadnought, that it would have a wider appeal than anything MB releases. I'm not a fan of 1:700 models, but size isn't a factor - I've seen people making 1:700 destroyers quite nicely. However, there are precedents for having multiple manufacturers modelling the same subject in the same scale, even simultaneously - off the top of my head, I can think of Roden, Eduard and Revell making the Fokker Dr1, and Trumpeter and Dragon both making 1:35 Brueckenleger Pz IVs.
This year will be the 70th anniversary of the Battle of the River Plate, and we don't have HMS Exeter in 1:600. What a pity.
|
Paddy O'Irishman
|
I am surprised Airfix haven't released a 1/600 Exeter, especially as they did release Graff Spee and Ajax. Airfix seem to release incomplete groups of models, eg, they have done all the main German WW2 ship types, except the light cruisers, a Koln or Konisberg in 1/600 would be a very welcome addition. Same with the British ships, a flush deck "County" class such as Norfolk would go very well with the cut down County's, ie Suffolk. And I'm surprised that Victorious was released in it's modified angled deck version. I would have thought that a 1941 version would have been more appropriate, bearing in mind Victorious played a major part in the Bismarck episode and is remembered mainly for that episode. I would also love to see a '41 version of Renoun to go with Repulse, as well as a "Royal Soveriegn" class, preferably Ramilles, which also took part in the Bismarck episode. I am surprised at the total lack of WW2 US and IJN heavy ships. They would make great subjects in 1/600. I too dont like 1/700, it's a bit small but mainly because most 1/700 are waterline only, I much prefer full hull. So come on Airfix, there is a market out there for you.
|
Beaufighter
|
There's a shortage of IJN and USN subjects in 1/600 only. In 1/700 literally every IJN ship from WW2 has been kitted, down to the minelayers and the laundry ships.
I notice with the Master Box wheeze that once again they are kitting the blandest items in the range. Dreadnought is quirky but the German subjects are just the usual boring four or five turrets down the centreline configuration.
|
Brews
|
| Paddy O'Irishman wrote: | | Victorious played a major part in the Bismarck episode and is remembered mainly for that episode. I would also love to see a '41 version of Renown to go with Repulse, as well as a "Royal Sovereign" class, preferably Ramilles, which also took part in the Bismarck episode. |
The feelings of the crew of Repulse in their pursuit of Bismarck may well be described by their relief that they weren't required.
Victorious was an Illustrious Class carrier. Illustrious took part in Taranto
|
peebeep
|
| Brews wrote: | Victorious was an Illustrious Class carrier. Illustrious took part in Taranto  |
...both of which can be modelled from the Heller 1/400 tooling which Airfix could release any time they like, presumably. Also both can be modelled from the Aoshima tooling in 1/700 which is currently available.
With regard to Dreadnought, I don't see why Airfix couldn't do one in 1/600, regardless of kits in other scales, assuming they are still prepared to tool up in 1/600. I have my doubts that they are, but I'd certainly settle for one at 1/350.
peebeep
|
Brews
|
| peebeep wrote: | | Brews wrote: | Victorious was an Illustrious Class carrier. Illustrious took part in Taranto  |
...both of which can be modelled from the Heller 1/400 tooling which Airfix could release any time they like, presumably. Also both can be modelled from the Aoshima tooling in 1/700 which is currently available.
|
I'm aware of those options, PB They're not the right scale though, are they?! I did relent some time back and bought some 1:400 ships - Bismarck, KGV, Hood and Collossus. My plan was to convert Collossus to Melbourne. Not happening in the near future, though.
|
peebeep
|
| Brews wrote: | | They're not the right scale though, are they?! |
Not if your aspirations include 1/600 ship collections...
I'm a pragmatist, I don't think any future releases will be in 1/600. Prove me wrong Airfix.
peebeep
|
Beaufighter
|
It's not like Airfix are heavily invested in a range of recently-tooled 1/600 kits with lots of life in them. The newest 1/600 mould must be Prinz Eugen or Repulse and those are, what, 25 years old?
A lot of the others are clapped out, inaccurate, or both. I don't rule out a retool of Bismarck, on the basis that it still sells regardless of inaccuracy. While they're retooling it in 1/600, though, they might as well retool in 1/700.
|
Steven Pietrobon
|
Paddy, there are some 1/600 US and IJN ships (including one French ship). The Rommel is a US ship and from other manufacturers we have
Kangnam USS Enterprise
Kangnam USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson (same as Arii?)
Arii USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson
Arii IJN Yamato/Musashi
Nichomo IJN Yamato/Musashi (same as Arii?)
Kitech/Zhengdefu Charles de Gaulle
|
sloop
|
A teaser:
|
Sgt.Squarehead
|
Nice work Sloop.....Why not make a post in the welcome section and introduce yourself (plus it will make the link work).
All the best
Sgt.S
|
tempestfan
|
| Beaufighter wrote: | It's not like Airfix are heavily invested in a range of recently-tooled 1/600 kits with lots of life in them. The newest 1/600 mould must be Prinz Eugen or Repulse and those are, what, 25 years old?
A lot of the others are clapped out, inaccurate, or both. I don't rule out a retool of Bismarck, on the basis that it still sells regardless of inaccuracy. While they're retooling it in 1/600, though, they might as well retool in 1/700. |
KGV and Repulse were released in '81 (possibly delayed to '82 for repulse) and Prinz around '74 or '75. While there's a separate thread on that topic, Airfix could have most of the RN WWII destroyer game for themselves, be it in 600th or 700th. Today there was a review of a new Trumpeter Tribal at Hyperscale which seems to have some serious (but manageable) errors - but nothing I'd expect in a kit whose price is indicated at 27 $ (but those may be kangaroo bucks).
|
Beaufighter
|
The key question is whether the market size is there. Ships are a niche within a niche, and thus only the WW2 USN / IJN really sell because those are what the majority of buyers want.
People probably buy the Airfix Hood, Bismarck etc simply because they're there. It seems plausible to me that there's a market for 10,000 RN subjects a year (or whatever number), and if you make Ark, Hood, Iron Duke and Victorious you'll sell 2,500 a year of each. If you add Courageous and Dreadnought to the lineup you might simply end up selling 1,667 of each, for more tooling and production cost but the same total of 10,000-odd units.
Since nobody is making new 1/600 tools any more (was Repulse the last 1/600 ship kitted?), there is no automatic appeal about the scale. You wouldn't today embark on a collection of ships in 1/600 scale (unless a very small one) because you know from the outset you can't complete it.
In 1/700, OTOH, the average ship modeller knows there's a 1/700 model of any subject he wants. He knows this because the canonical "average ship modeller" is, statistically, either American or Japanese and not really interested in anyone else's navies. Every significant ship of the former's WW2 navy, and the entirety of the latter's, has been kitted.
If Airfix do decide to kit more ships, I think they'd be well advised to switch to 1/700 or 1/350, because in those scales, there is at least the possibility of a few sales outside the UK. There are only two WW2 aircraft carriers in 1/350, for example - the US Essex class and a (very expensive) IJN Akagi - so a well-executed Ark Royal or Victorious might actually interest a few builders in that scale who are bored of building the usual battleships. In fact, if they kitted an RN ship sunk by the Axis, they'd almost certainly pick up a few sales from Japanese modellers and Anglophobic Americans. Royal Oak, maybe; Glorious; Hermes - one of those would work.
The trouble then would be that Airfix's current and legacy ship range would be a complete dog's breakfast of scales: 1/1200, perhaps 1/700, 1/600, 1/400, maybe 1/350 and 1/72. I suspect they may want to flog the old Heller moulds thoroughly to death before going down that route.
Alternatively, more 1/72 subjects seem plausible; Kennedy's PT boat, maybe - there is little competition in this field and with the exception of the rather dodgy E-boat the kits offered so far have all landed rather well. There seem to be some fit issues with the Lifeboat but I've yet to hear it dismissed as an uninteresting subject or a silly scale.
|
Paddy O'Irishman
|
| Quote: | Paddy, there are some 1/600 US and IJN ships (including one French ship). The Rommel is a US ship and from other manufacturers we have
Kangnam USS Enterprise
Kangnam USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson (same as Arii?)
Arii USS Iowa/New Jersey/Missouri/Wisconson
Arii IJN Yamato/Musashi
Nichomo IJN Yamato/Musashi (same as Arii?)
Kitech/Zhengdefu Charles de Gaulle
Hi Steve, I have all of then except Yamato/Musashi, there on average twice the price of a comparable Airfix kit, and the quality is questionable, especially the Iowa's, the Enterprise is a direct knock-off of the Tamiya 1/350 kit, it's just been scaled down, even the instruction booklet is identical to Tamiya's. The Kangnam/Arii kits are basically the same, even the 4 Iowa's are actually the one model with just some extra bits chucked in for the New Jersey's extended bridge. |
|
|