 |
- The Airfix Tribute Forum - The Airfix Tribute Forum was established in April 2006 to discuss the making of Airfix models. Email: admin at airfixtributeforum.co.uk |
Click here to sign up to ATF
Search before you post. Advanced search, use link at top of page
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Tue 29 Jul 2008 21:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for taking a stab Ratch - here's the answers:
| Ratch wrote: | OK, here's my guess
1 = Hu: 65 No - WEM RL65
2 = WEM RLM65 No - Hu65
3 = WEM RLM72 Correct
4 = Hu:27 Correct
5 = Hu:30 No - Hu149
6 = Hu:91 No - WEM RLM 73
7 = Hu:149 No - Hu30
8 = WEM RLM73 No - Hu91
The WEM RLM65 looks good for the undersurfaces (Hu:65 looks too bright)
As for the others, none look like the Xtracolor RLM72/73 that I use
I reckon you could get away with Hu:91 (although your sample doesn't seem to be mixed properly) not sure about the other splinter colour though  |
I was a bit surprised. The WEM RLM72 and 73 are very similar shades - the photos accentuate the differences actually, and in some natural lights, or electric, they're quite hard to distinguish. While this might fit a couple of colour photos I found of the real plane, I didn't want this for the model as I think a bit of visual contrast is more attractive.
So, with the contrast idea in mind I'd already decided to make a plane with the yellow theatre markings of the Eastern Med circa 1941/2. Two online sources depicted one of the Arado camo colours (not sure if it was the 72 or the 73) with a distinct browny hue, which I liked. The wide variety of different shades suggested for RLM72 makes me wonder if actually the correct answer is 'we don't know - it's lost to the mists of history' so I added a bunch of Hu118 to my WEM RLM 72 and forged on with a complete disregard of any heresy I might be about to commit.
The rear fuselage was sprayed white, then masked. It, and the wing tips and underside of the engine were sprayed in Hu149. These panels were then masked and the undersides sprayed in Hu65. Yet more Tamiya tape and the uppersides were sprayed in WEM72/Hu118 'abomination' hue. Even more Tamiya tape and it was sprayed again in WEM RLM73. By this point, a rather unappealing looking swaddled beast was the result:
I didn't take any pictures during the painting process so I'll show the unveiling steps - the next photo is after removing the tape protecting the home brew RLM72:
Next the undersides were revealed:
Then the gelb theatre colours: the inset shows a yellow panel on top of the rear fuselage:
Next the white fuselage band:
And finally, the engine was unmasked:
Overall, I'm reasonably happy - a few colour bleeds to clear up but nothing too disastrous.
More tomorrow hopefully as I'm on a week off.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dancho
Model Portfolio
Silver Star


Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 2094
Location: Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Tue 29 Jul 2008 21:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"Exact colors" of warplanes are very difficult to obtain (if not impossible). It's a fascinating subject, but ultimately a bit pointless. On the other hand...
Never mind. I have found an excellent guide to interpreting black and white photos to be good quality color photos. What I mean is this: the late Jeffrey Ethell collected a whole slew of outstanding color photos of WWII aircraft (90% U.S., but still). I highly recommend his books. They are without peer.
These books teach this lesson: if you don't have a color photo, you're guessing. So many planes in his books just have the WILDEST paint jobs and you'd never guess it from the B&W photos. Ya gotta see the color to KNOW.
That's my humble opinion, anyway.
P.S.-- G.I.'s did NOT know that warplanes should have "matte" finishes. About 50% of the planes shown in Ethell's books are so shiny that they indicate that the ground crew polished and waxed them! _________________ “Build what YOU want, the way YOU want to, and above all, have fun.”
- Al Superczynski (1947 - 2007) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008 17:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dancho - re polishing aircraft - I just read in a history of the RAF Bomber command that a nice shiny NMF finish had the advantage of increasing airspeed a few mph. Presumably polishing the camo finish would have a similar effect?
Anyway - more progress:
Floats in place now - still need some wire rigging though. Getting them installed wasn't as bad a job as I feared. Of course as soon as it was together I tried it for size on the catapult. Cue an unexpected problem - it's a nose sitter. I may have to glue it on the catapult after all, something I'd hoped to avoid.
The major decals are also on now, courtesy of good old Klear. The were the replacement decals, not the still rather yellowed Airfix originals:
the |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard M
Administrator Group Build Guru Group Build Leader Model Portfolio
Airfix Modelling SIG Leader
Bronze Bar


Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 4364
Location: Cyprus
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008 18:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's coming on really well, can't wait to see it glued to the catapult!
Best
Rich _________________ Best
Rich
---------------------------
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... Time to die."
Visit my PORTFOLIO |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
morgandude1
Green Star

Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 315
Location: Harrow
|
Posted: Thu 31 Jul 2008 20:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's looking rather good isn't it?
Well done so far!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heinkel51
Model Portfolio
Bronze Star

Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1131
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun 03 Aug 2008 21:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lovely!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomasweir
Airfix Modelling SIG Member
Silver Star

Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 2135
Location: saddleworth
|
Posted: Mon 04 Aug 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks superb  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Mon 04 Aug 2008 19:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks again for the comments!
With luck this will be the last update before the thing is finished. But for the record, here's the weekend's progress.
Now that final assembly of the catapult is nearing, how to attach the turntable to the base? My cutting of the spray can lid that provided the barrel wasn't that accurate and simply gluing the two together looked like a poor option. The solution as shown below was to use some old bits and bobs of Meccano - a common as muck 1" pulley and a damaged 50t gear providing the bearings. Somehow it tickles me to think that the pulley is about the same age as the Hipper class cruisers (whose catapult is modelled here) and the gear is 10 years older.
The base for the model is going to be a lid from a Jack Daniels presentation box but I've been mulling over prettying it up somewhat for a while. Yesterday I decided to go for it - the aim was to model a generic section of warship deck. Aimed for by planking a section of the lid with beechwood strips, edged with plasticard and some whitemetal three bar railing stanchions and bollards:
And here's a couple of shots of the two together. The deck still needs some weathering to match the catapult.
And onto the aircraft - I finished off the decals with some stencils, settled everything down with a coat of Klear and then a thin coat of matt varnish. Most of the cockpit was put in after this. I also added the red noses to the spinner and floats, and the rudders to the back of the floats:
And then my first go at rigging - I used some very fine gauge surgical steel wire acquired along the way - I've left it in its natural shiny finish as by this point, every time I pick the thing up I run the risk of breaking or bending something...
So what's left? Canopy and machine gun. I think the latter will be the rate limiting step as everything I've read says the kit is wrong in supplying a double MG - it should be a single. More to the point, the kit one isn't great and as I've spent I don't like to thnk how much on the model so far, I went the last extra and ordered a replacement resin MG. No word on delivery date for that though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JackJ
Group Build Leader Model Portfolio
Blue Star


Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 816
Location: Berkshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon 04 Aug 2008 20:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
looking fantastic _________________ ACHTUNG-MOSQUITO
Tomcat by choice / Hornet by mandate
Official Airfix Club Member 2008 2009
aircraft carrier build GL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XN923
Group Build Leader.
Bronze Star

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Tue 05 Aug 2008 09:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
The whole thing is just astounding. Not only that beautiful catapult and mount but the superlative weathering. The aircraft itself is very nicely done too. I really must get over my fear of PE brass in this quantity, it looks like the results you can get are unbelievable. Maybe I'll break out that Dragon Bachem Natter with launch tower...
What did you use to prime the PE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 07:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
thanks XN923!
The PE was wiped down with meths and then primed (and indeed then left as done) with a couple of coats of some bare metal primer from a rattle can - I forget the brand, but it came from a DIY store, Focus I think. It's pretty close to Hu64, especially after a couple of washes with diluted oil paint!
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dancho
Model Portfolio
Silver Star


Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 2094
Location: Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow.
Great stuff! _________________ “Build what YOU want, the way YOU want to, and above all, have fun.”
- Al Superczynski (1947 - 2007) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sgt.Squarehead
Moderator Group Build Leader
Two Gold Stars


Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 9209
Location: Sunny Worcester
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome!
All the best |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ratch
Administrator Group Build Guru Group Build Leader Model Portfolio
Airfix Modelling SIG Member
Site Owner

Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 21081
Location: Northampton UK
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's looking really superb I'm not sure about the brown-ness of the camo - but that's just a personal thing You've really done a top-grade job so far  _________________ and was Jerusalem, builded here
The new No. 2
Airfix Club 500287
IPMS 10983 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dancho
Model Portfolio
Silver Star


Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 2094
Location: Minnesota, USA
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 14:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be interesting to know how the "brown" tint came to replace the "bluer" shades as correct Luftwaffe colors. There must be a book that established these correct shades. I wonder which one? I still believe in the colors that were probably Humbrol or Pactra shades from the sixties. Very blue compared to now. I spent hours mixing my Luftwaffe colors to shift them back to the blue end of the spectrum. Now I know how the Pope feels! If it was good enough back then, it's good enough NOW. _________________ “Build what YOU want, the way YOU want to, and above all, have fun.”
- Al Superczynski (1947 - 2007) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XN923
Group Build Leader.
Bronze Star

Joined: 16 May 2008 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Wed 06 Aug 2008 16:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dancho wrote: | | Now I know how the Pope feels! If it was good enough back then, it's good enough NOW. |
Don't know about that... I can't speak for Luftwaffe colours but when it comes to early WW2 Fleet Air Arm colours, we know way more now than we did in the 60s. It's taken years of digging in archives through documents that were previously classified, examining paint chips from recovered aircraft, studying what few colour images come to light and so on. Look at a colour guide for a Frog Blackburn Skua and it will tell you, e.g. dark green/earth camo, sky undersides, low camouflage demarcation etc. etc. The same aircraft should be extra-dark sea grey/dark slate grey upper surfaces and sky grey under surfaces with a higher demarcation... but then there are further problems in that many of the colours were approximations mixed at squadrons or maintenance units that differed from the original colours, and as they started to fade and weather, began to diverge quite significantly.
Then you have the unclear or misunderstood instructions. Let's take Skuas again. In June 1940 an order goes round the fleet that roundels should be type A1 on the fuselage and Type A fin flashes should be added to tail fins. Undersides should now be Sky. The Skua squadrons were busy fighting off the Fliegerkorps X over Norway at the time, so the squadron maintainers hastily painted the roundels and flashes, in totally non standard proportions and colours. Then, either someone thought sky meant sky blue, or the substitute phrase duck egg blue was interpreted too literally, but the undersides of the aircraft were painted something approximating light Mediterranean blue - possibly roundel blue mixed with white. How can we tell? Well, before March this year we couldn't. We had guesswork, some B&W photos with a suspicious demarcation line where there shouldn't be one, and an armourer's recollection that some aircraft were repainted in this colour. Then, conveniently, a Skua was raised from a fjord earlier this year, with blue paint underneath all the marine growth adhering to it .
Anyway, I'm in danger of going way off topic, but I mean to suggest that it's probably not one definitive book that comes along and changes everything when it comes to colours, but a slow 'drip drip' of new information coming to light over a period of time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Heinkel51
Model Portfolio
Bronze Star

Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 1131
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun 10 Aug 2008 13:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lovely Digs, I'm left speechless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Sat 16 Aug 2008 19:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Finished! And only a day over schedule - blame the Olympics!
Canopies framed with painted decal strip and a handle for the sliding section added before they were glued in place with clearfix and gap filled with PVA.
The resin machine gun turned up in the post, was assembled, painted and superglued in place.
And finally - aerial mast added and rigged with fine monofilament.
Pictures to follow tomorrow if there's sunshine - I've spent enough time, money & effort on this I want the pics to look as good as I can manage. At the very least, taken away from the backdrop of the crudpile that is my workbench!
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Digs
Model Portfolio
Red Star

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 701
Location: East Anglia
|
Posted: Sun 24 Aug 2008 15:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A week later and I've finally go to photograph it:
I'm very pleased with how this has turned out. Things I don't like however - the rubbish painting of the grab handles, the canopy framing and some of the gunmetal drybrushing.
More photos of it on its catapult will arrive in the GB Gallery shortly. Thanks to everyone who commented on the build!
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brews
Airfix Modelling SIG Member
Silver Star

Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 2811
Location: Nanaimo. British Columbia. Canadia
|
Posted: Sun 24 Aug 2008 16:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for sharing. Did you use the WEM RLM 65? It doesn't look as bright on the underside as the colour swatch you painted for us. _________________ “The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” Winston Churchill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|